If the cost of regaining pure air in a city is the removal of all apparatus that bum coal or petroleum or petrol or gas again the price is too high. In this instance, additional technical improvements appear to be in sight yet the expense of removing pollutants from vehicle exhausts is sure to be quite excellent. Who decides? And who bears the price? It’s not a simple yes or no question. One thing is certain, Los Angeles smog could be almost entirely eliminated by prohibiting the driving of automobiles, buses, and trucks. Clearly, however, this would be far too expensive and far too disruptive even to contemplate. Viewed in this light, we see the issue of smog is just a pretty small adverse effect of a technological development which has generated vast benefits.

Undoubtedly, the problem here is primarily an economic one, though it has many political and social overtones. These traffic issues may be significantly alleviated by the building of large multiple highway or expressway systems some elevated or some subterranean by the construction of big public parking facilities, and by the development of new mechanisms of mass transportation. All of these ventures are technically possible. The economic problem can be illustrated by imagining the cost of erecting an eight lane highway down through the center of Manhattan, joined with a dozen or more cross-town expressways at suitably spaced periods. Are we then going to be forced to live eternally with the problem of traffic congestion? Or can new technical or economical alternatives be developed? Here is a technical economic political dilemma much more challenging and sweeping in its potential than all of the problems introduced by the area of automation.

Another technically feasible operation is that of producing considerable amounts of electrical power with the use of uranium fuelled reactors. Many technical issues remain to be solved, particularly in the area of insuring security of such installments in the event of injury or calamity. This cogent cactusclimb4 on Genius link has varied compelling suggestions for how to look at it. Nevertheless, the primary problem is currently an economic one. The cost of supplying large scale electricity to the entire nation by uranium reactors is still substantially greater than that of supplying it by more traditional means. Learn additional info on the affiliated website – Click here: 2711p-k7c15d1. And this will definitely remain true until additional technical developments happen in reactor technology, or until we begin debilitation of our supply of fossil fuels. Advertiser includes more about where to do this viewpoint. In any case, “affordable and ample” electricity from uranium is still far in the foreseeable future.

Finally, of course and more to the point is the question not of how we can prevent the further mechanization and automation of business, but of how we can accelerate its progress and achieve a very much more quickly climbing manufacturing productivity. The technical means are at hand to improve immensely many industrial production procedures. The barriers are: (1) technical issues of adapting present knowledge to new uses; (2) the large levels of capital required; and (3) the societal difficulties due to a too rapid displacement of workers. Be taught more on this related site by visiting The industries with employment decreases – Wedding Blogs – Project Wedding. It ought to be recalled in this connection, however, that, of all, the more than one hundred million persons in the U.S., just 16.5 million are engaged in production industries. But such a great expansion of productivity would create new businesses, expand many old ones, and make more affordable products and an increased market, so that the actual displacement would be far smaller. Certainly, then, if we set a more modest aim of raising our productivity from the present rate of increase of 3 percent per year to, say, 4 percent, just 160,000 production jobs would be in jeopardy in a year, and we ought surely to be able to discover ways of replacing these jobs by new ones in new businesses or in production occupations. At least I suggest this is a manageable societal difficulty..